Asa Service Agreement
Commission decision approving the standard clauses for inclusion in bilateral air services agreements between Member States and third countries, which have been jointly defined by the Commission and Member States, the attached documents are internal working documents drawn up for internal use. This document can only be used as a guide to services authorized and operated under bilateral air services agreements and agreements in Australia. The rights and capabilities negotiated under the bilateral air services agreement and Australia`s agreements are under ongoing review and airlines often change their operations. Because of the synthesis of the information contained in this document, the Commonwealth assumes no responsibility for the accuracy or currencies of the information provided. The rights provided, the synthesis of the timetable and capacity information should not be expected to be decisive or be invoked, and individuals should rely on their own investigations. This work aims to remove legal uncertainty and ensure the continuity of bilateral ASAs and the development of international air services. The adaptation of existing bilateral agreements to EU legislation also applies to the third countries concerned and to the entire aviation sector, including airlines, users, etc.) It`s important. Therefore, this objective must be achieved effectively and within a reasonable time frame. Note: EU external aviation policy: why does the EU want to change air agreements between its member states and partner countries? Air Services Agreements (ASAs) are formal contracts between countries – Memorandums of Understanding (Memorandum of Understanding) and formal diplomatic notes. It is not mandatory to have an ASA for the operation of international services, but cases where contract-free services exist are rare. One of the first AAS after World War II was the Bermuda Agreement, signed in 1946 by the United Kingdom and the United States. The characteristics of this agreement have become models for the thousands of agreements that were to follow, although in recent decades some of the traditional clauses of these agreements have been amended (or “liberalized”) in accordance with the “open skies” policy of some governments, particularly the United States.  If an agreement does not contain the EU designation clause (all EU air carriers based in the territory of the relevant EU Member State have the opportunity to apply for available traffic rights), it would be contrary to the objectives of this common policy.